A lot of people are worried about the possibility of accidentally electing Donald Trump because they chose to vote for a 3rd party candidate like Jill Stein. And when you consider a man like Donald Trump, you can certainly understand why. Donald Trump is clearly a narcissistic, egomaniacal, tax dodging, racist, filthy, blathering idiot. Which is why we often hear about Hillary as “the lesser of two evils.” However, truth is sometimes stranger than fiction.
Why isn’t anyone talking about the serious risks and dangers involved with a Hillary presidency?
No, I’m not talking about the criticisms that come from crazy alt-right conspiracy nutcases like Alex Jones, Trey Gowdy, or any other Republican nuts. I’m talking about criticisms that have come from people like Susan Sarandon or Democrat Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard; you know, liberals?
Hillary has some rather extreme military proposals. For example, Hillary’s no-fly zone proposal over Syria has received much criticism from Democrats in congress as well as military personnel. For starters, Hillary’s no-fly zone proposal would be extremely expensive. Contrary to what many believe, it would almost certainly require ground troops stationed to secure borders and it may even be necessary to open new military bases simply to watch the skies. You would have to pay for 24/7 drone patrol, satellite surveillance, a whole naval and aerial fleet ready to deploy 24/7, anti-aircraft missiles, and much, much more. All of this is going to cost billions upon billions of dollars. What they’re not telling you is that Hillary’s no-fly zone proposal could actually cost more than Donald Trump’s proposed 30 billion dollar wall.
As if the cost of the proposal alone isn’t enough, many military personnel have stated that it would absolutely require us to go to war with Russia, no exceptions. General Joseph Dunford stated, “Right now, for us to control all the airspace in Syria would require us to go to war against Syria and Russia.” Congresswoman Gabbard has also stated that this could easily escalate into a larger international war where, essentially, nations from across the globe are forced to jump in and choose sides in a split-second. This could get messy very quickly. Representatives like Gabbard have even suggested that it could lead to WW3, nuclear stand-off, or even nuclear engagement.
Putin has stated that negotiating with Obama and Hillary “is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, shits on the board, then struts around like it won the game.”
When I first heard this, I thought it sounded like she was over-exaggerating. However, many officials seem to be very seriously worried about the possibility of WW3 as well.
Hillary continues to spout crazy conspiracy theories about the Russian government. She’s stated everything from the Russians are trying to rig the election to the Russians have infiltrated the Republican party. We’re not saying that there isn’t some evidence that the Russians may have hacked into the DNC. However, no intelligence agency, not the FBI, not the DHS, not the NSA, has provided conclusive evidence to suggest that even half of Hillary’s crazy conspiracy claims are true. While there is some evidence that the hack on the DNC’s main servers resembles a certain Russian hacker team, there’s no direct evidence of them hacking into the HRC campaign’s computer systems. Intelligence agencies are not over-reacting to this because these are instances of just ordinary, everyday espionage that really does happen every single day. That’s because this is the 21st century, and everyone hacks everyone. It’s like Hillary doesn’t understand modern technology. But then again, Hillary is a 69-year-old woman who needs an entire team of people just to send a tweet.
Hillary has even gone as far as to directly threaten nuclear powers like Russia in the middle of a debate or on live television, calling for a “military response.” Russia has recently unveiled its newest nuclear warhead. The warhead is literally named Satan 2. Russia’s missile was specifically designed to outmaneuver anti-nuke systems like GMD and is capable of evading radar. It has the capacity to deliver a blast of 40 megatons. That’s enough to destroy Texas. Obviously, it’s much more advanced than any of our old outdated systems. Recently, Britain and NATO have sent troops to Russian borders in suspense of a possible developing cold war. Given Hillary’s many extreme military proposals as well as her track record of supporting many wars, including Iraq and Libya, or the way she threatens leaders like Putin on live television, her time as president with these lurking dangers could be disastrous.
Hillary has stated, “One of the first things I will do as president is to call for a new nuclear posture review. We have to make sure that America’s arsenal is prepared to meet future threats.” “We need to respond to evolving threats from states like Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.” “We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses.” We’re all very worried about the possibility of Donald Trump saying these things, but Hillary keeps saying these things and no one seems to care? Putin has stated that negotiating with Obama and Hillary “is like playing chess with a pigeon. The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, shits on the board, then struts around like it won the game.” It would appear that Hillary is prepared to act like a bully in a schoolyard when what we need, is a global leader.
Jill Stein has stated that she wants to develop a foreign policy based entirely on international law. Jill Stein has also stated that she would withdraw any unnecessary military forces throughout the Middle East. Gary Johnson is firmly anti-war. Even Donald Trump has made it painstakingly clear that he wants a peaceful relationship with global leaders like Putin. However, Hillary is very serious about these military proposals. Unfortunately, she has told us to our faces that she does not wish to behave peacefully with leaders like Putin. People often think about our relationship with Britain, Mexico, or the U.N. But let’s be honest, we’re not going to have to worry about war with any of these countries. Unfortunately, if we elect Hillary, we’d be intentionally electing a president who’s relationship with many dangerous threats like Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea is contentious at best. That is to say, none of these important leaders, who we could seriously go to war with, even like or trust Hillary Clinton.
No issue… not abortion, not education, not even health care, takes priority over the possibility of a new cold war, WW3, or even nuclear engagement.
So if you’re still convinced that Hillary is a “lesser of two evils,” you may need to take a closer look. Unfortunately, both Hillary and Trump are extremely dangerous candidates, albeit in different ways.
Although we may kick ourselves for it later, although he is terrible, and although we may hate him — there’s even a chance that a Donald Trump presidency could be a blessing in disguise. To quote Jill Stein, “The clock is ticking on the next Wall Street collapse, the climate meltdown, the expanding wars, the slide towards fascism, nuclear confrontation and more. This is the time to stand up with the courage of our convictions, while we still can. Forget the lesser evil. Fight for the greater good like our lives depend on it, because they do.”